What I Saw, as a Former Blob Media Journalist Who Is a Girl, at the Hill & Valley ForumMay 9
a story about me bumming zyns from christ-loving manufacturing founders who want to build the future
Blake Dodge“Network architecture is destiny.” Thus opens Chris Dixon’s great new book, Read Write Own, a chronicling of the open Internet, its corporate takeover, and the dawn of blockchain networks — the third network era. This week, I had the pleasure of hosting Chris on the Pirate Wires pod, and we had a great conversation on all of this and more:
In preparation for our conversation, I got to thinking of investment in blockchain technology and networks more generally. Drown out in our current AI hysteria, and following the last bull run roulette wheel crash, crypto continues to be ignored, even as evidence of (yet another) slow rise from the ashes mounts.
2023 was an unmitigated disaster for crypto investing, with commitments crashing to something like $10.7 billion from around $33.3 billion. There were a few signs of enthusiasm as early as Q3 of last year, however, and on the other side of the most recent euphoric bull run builders in the space seem happy. Nobody liked the scammy culture of 2021 and 2022, or its clownish hype men, and now it’s back to real enthusiasts and the purest sort of nerd shit. Also, as yet again needs to be said, this is not the first time “crypto is dead.” It’s been like this for almost 15 years, and every declaration of the space’s full destruction only underscores what seems to be its inherent anti-fragility (another great book by the way, though the author blocked me on Twitter R.I.P.)
While Q4 reportedly saw $1.98 billion invested in crypto, down slightly from Q3, insiders believe the numbers are likely a bit higher (holidays + many deals not yet announced), and probably inching just past what we saw in Q3. With vigor back in ETH and BTC, and Coinbase popping off, you can sort of feel the trembling underground. As one investor framed it to me:
“reasons for more excitement:
At its highest level, there does remain an interesting, as-yet unanswered question buried in the crypto conversation. Freedom-entrenching applications of the technology appear to be something we want to exist, and maybe need to exist, rather than something most people want to use. But that is at least something this generation of builders is attempting to tackle — can we make this easier? Seamless, even? Can we bake some kind of decentralized defense into our digital lives without the average customer even realizing it?
My unfortunate sense is the average person will never stop trading liberty for ease, but the speculative aspect of crypto we all hate nonetheless guarantees excitement at the top of every single cycle, and with it funding. Then, if the tech can’t die, can it ever really lose? Invulnerability is, at least, something.
---
NOTABLE INDUSTRY TRENDS
The most difficult 24 hours of Mark Cuban’s life. Following weeks of feuding between billionaires Mark Cuban and Elon Musk over the question of DEI (Mark believes race-based hiring practices are moral, while Elon believes hiring someone because of their race is a moral abomination), Cuban stupidly entered a public exchange with X user “TheRabbitHole84” over the same question. The meat of their ensuing back-and-forth sprawled over a full 24 hours (though is still days later, to some extent, ongoing), and led to the rabbit’s insistence Mark answer the question of whether or not he’d ever hired based on race, which would constitute a violation of Title VII. Mark said he had not hired strictly for race or gender, but race and gender had been a factor in hiring, which — in accordance with Mark’s warped sense of American law — was perfectly legal. At this point, an official commissioner of the US Equal Opportunity Employment Commission entered the chat, informing Cuban he was “dead wrong on black-letter Title VII law,” which triggered an avalanche of mockery and ridicule. As it turned out, the Shark Tank billionaire had just, in conversation with an animated rabbit, publicly admitted to criminal hiring practices.
Finally, succumbing to embarrassment perhaps, Cuban began an AMA, imploring users on X to “fire away” with their questions. And so concluded the most difficult 24 hours of his life:
A dumb ass Delaware judge we didn’t ask. A Delaware judge on Tuesday ruled Elon’s $55 billion incentive package at Tesla is void, saying Elon’s “Superstar CEO” influence prevented the share grant from being set at a fair price. If the ruling is upheld, Elon stands to lose about 10% of the company. It really would have been a massive payout, at “33 times larger” than the closest comparison. But Elon responded to the incentive and roughly 10x’d Tesla’s value since the plan was put in place in 2018. So who won here? Not the activist who sued Musk, as he holds just nine shares of TSLA, and certainly not the Tesla investor base, as the price of TSLA slid 5% after the deranged ruling.
Elon’s first tweet in reaction to the ruling: “Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware” (standard practice throughout tech, and American business more broadly). He’s incorporated X Corp in Nevada, which offers better protections from frivolous investor suits, and on Tuesday suggested Tesla could move out of Delaware to Texas. (FT)
One thing I can’t help but notice: yet another judge wielding the American courts like a weapon against a political opponent. An increasing danger.
Okay, we unfortunately do have to talk about the AI-generated Taylor Swift porn. Over the weekend, deepfake nudes of America’s sweetheart went viral, prompting a hurricane of fury and reaction across the internet. X temporarily blocked searches for “Taylor Swift,” where her fandom launched a “#ProtectTaylorSwift” campaign that attempted to bury the nudes in a flood of PG-rated Taylor images. The White House responded to the incident, calling for social media companies to take more action. Abroad, hinting at what’s sure to be widespread international sentiment, India is telling social media companies they’ll be held accountable for the spread of deepfakes on their platforms.
Microsoft made changes to their AI tool “Designer” which may have been the vehicle used to create these fakes, and elsewhere, platforms like X are beefing up their content moderation teams. Meta has always been more closeted about the scale and scope of its moderation team, but it’s as safe to assume they’re well ahead of the curve here as it is to assume this topic will only grow louder, and (understandably) more emotional as the tools become easier to use. We are frankly just not built to watch our loved ones exploited in this way, and if our tech chads working in the space don’t solve the problem now — in my humble opinion! — it could bring the entire Industry down.
---
Positions on America’s drug tourist problem tend to bifurcate between 1) ‘Jail forever,’ and 2) ‘What problem? You’re crazy, there is no problem.’ In his guest piece for Pirate Wires, George Hotz offers a third, more interesting solution: simply give the people what they want.
Read the full piece here.
---
BROAD TECH:
$$$:
AI:
---
Media layoffs, Jon Stewart is back, our thoughts on Barbie being shunned at the Oscars by the patriarchy, and more – check out the latest podcast with the Pirate Wires crew here.
Hey, and do me a favor: can you please review the hell out of this thing wherever you listen to your podcasts? Apple? Spotify? I’m getting roasted in there lol I need your help
---
LITIGATION AND REGULATION:
An interesting trend, this morning, following instances of the United States government teaming up with the governments of China and Europe to kneecap the United States’ technology industry:
HUMAN RESOURCES:
TRADE WAR:
EU v. Apple v. The World. In an effort to comply with new antitrust restrictions from the EU, Apple has issued their response — an historic overhaul of the App Store, both lowering commissions and allowing third-party competition (sort of)… while simultaneously levying a new slate of fees that others, including Spotify’s Daniel Ek, were not happy about (Daniel broke is grievances down on X, in a long thread starting here).
The CEO of Epic Games, long embroiled in war with Cook, called the moves “hot garbage,” claiming Apple can still choose which stores are allowed to compete with the App Store, and taking particular issue with a host of additional “Junk Fees.”
---
This newsletter was compiled with a great deal of assistance from Riley Nork.
0 free articles left